Should Podcast Platforms Regulate Inactive Feeds? The Great Cleanup Debate

Are you tired of searching for podcasts only to find shows that haven’t been updated in years? You’re not alone. With millions of podcast feeds out there, many are just sitting empty – taking up space and making it harder to find active shows.

This raises an important question: Should the companies that host podcasts step in and clean up these dead feeds? Some people think it would make podcasting better for everyone. Others worry it could hurt creators who are just taking a break.

Let’s look at both sides of this debate and what it could mean for the future of podcasting.

Step-by-Step Guide: How Platforms Could Handle Inactive Podcast Feeds

Here’s a detailed look at how podcast hosting platforms could create a fair system to manage inactive feeds:

Step 1: Set Clear Time Limits

What this means: Platforms would decide how long a podcast can go without new episodes before it’s considered “inactive.”

• Most experts suggest 12-18 months without updates
• Different rules could apply to different types of shows (daily news vs. seasonal podcasts)
• Platforms would clearly tell creators about these time limits upfront

Step 2: Create a Warning System

What this means: Instead of suddenly removing shows, platforms would give creators multiple chances to respond.

• First warning: Email sent at 10 months of inactivity
• Second warning: Email and dashboard notification at 12 months
• Final warning: Multiple contact attempts at 15 months
• Each warning would explain what happens next and how to avoid removal

Step 3: Offer Simple Ways to Stay Active

What this means: Give creators easy options to keep their feeds alive without forcing new content.

• Add a “taking a break” status that extends the deadline
• Allow creators to post short update messages
• Create an “archive mode” that keeps shows searchable but marks them as inactive
• Let creators set an expected return date

Step 4: Sort Feeds Into Categories

What this means: Not all inactive feeds should be treated the same way.

• Temporarily paused: Creator indicated they’re taking a break
• Truly abandoned: No response to warnings, payment issues, broken contact info
• Complete series: Shows that were meant to end (like limited series)
• Seasonal shows: Podcasts that only post during certain times of year

Step 5: Take Graduated Actions

What this means: Different consequences based on the situation, not just “delete everything.”

• Light action: Remove from “new and noteworthy” sections
• Medium action: Stop including in search results for new listeners
• Heavy action: Move to archive section with warning labels
• Final action: Complete removal after extended period and multiple warnings

Step 6: Make Appeals Easy

What this means: Give creators a simple way to get their shows back if removed by mistake.

• Clear contact information for appeals
• Fast response time (within 48 hours)
• Simple form to fill out, not complex procedures
• Automatic restoration if creator can prove they’re active again

Step 7: Protect Valuable Content

What this means: Don’t remove shows that people still want to hear.

• Check download numbers - keep shows people still listen to
• Preserve shows with high ratings or reviews
• Protect educational content or historically important episodes
• Keep shows that other websites or apps still link to

Step 8: Give Creators Control

What this means: Let podcast creators make the final decisions about their content.

• Easy “keep my show active” button creators can click anytime
• Option to transfer shows to other hosting platforms
• Ability to download all files before deletion
• Choice to make feeds “read-only” instead of deleting them

Step 9: Be Transparent About the Process

What this means: Make sure everyone understands the rules and what’s happening.

• Publish clear policies that are easy to read
• Send regular reports showing which shows are at risk
• Create a public list of recently removed feeds
• Explain decisions when creators ask questions

Step 10: Keep Improving the System

What this means: Regularly check if the rules are working and make changes when needed.

• Ask creators for feedback every 6 months
• Track how many shows get removed vs. how many become active again
• Adjust time limits based on what actually works
• Add new features based on what creators request

This step-by-step approach would help clean up inactive feeds while being fair to creators and preserving valuable content that listeners still enjoy.

Conclusion

The question of whether podcast platforms should regulate inactive feeds doesn’t have a simple yes or no answer. Both sides make good points.

Clean-up efforts could help listeners find active shows more easily and reduce clutter. But they could also hurt creators who are just taking a break or dealing with life challenges.

The best solution likely lies somewhere in the middle. Platforms could create gentle systems that warn creators, offer flexible options, and focus on truly abandoned feeds rather than shows that are just on pause.

What matters most is that any system puts creators first while still improving the experience for listeners. After all, podcasting works best when it’s easy for both sides – the people making shows and the people listening to them.

What do you think? Should platforms step in, or is the current hands-off approach better? The future of podcasting might depend on getting this balance just right.

---

Want to keep your podcast active and engaging? Turn your best episodes into shareable video clips with PodClips to maintain audience engagement even during content breaks.